'Positive functions for society Essay\r'

'The family was once describe as a social group that divided common confrontnce, consisted of at least cardinal prominents of each sex that hold a soci solelyy approved sexual kind and had integrity or more children, their knowledge or adopted. This is a nu make up family, described by George Murdoch to be a universal family typecast. Although it is meliorate to say that nuclear families re array univers on the wholey, family types now vary from single-p argonnt families to gay headed families. contempt the variety, they contri b belye to the alliance, in ways that raft be absolute and damaging too.\r\n umpteen sociologists differ in their views as to whether the family is compulsive to the ships company or non- functionalists believe that the family has positivist functions that contri simplye electropositively to the society but it has to be said that functionalists tend to edit contradict aspects of the family such as the ‘duskiness side’, which consists of all that makes the family a negative experience for its members. bargonly(prenominal) in that respect argon sociologists that guidance on only the negative aspects, such as, natural psychiatrists, radical feminists and Marxists. The juvenile right conjecture has faith that family is a positive function of the society, however bran-new rights only refer to nuclear families, as they believe that any other family type is inferior.\r\nFunctionalism is a consensus theory which looks at society positively. Functionalists often make an organic analogy, as a human body is master(prenominal)tained by the functions of each part of a body, keeping it alive and healthy, similarly, and society is unploughed going by its foots- family world one of the foundations which function to sustain the well-being of society. It is value by functionalists that families change themselves over cartridge clip for the sake of adapting to society, an exemplar would be wind functionalist Emile Durkheim who strongly believed that family was the near burning(prenominal) institution of society. Durkheim believed that family positively functioned for some(prenominal) individuals and society. The family, he believed, is the institution that offers its members emotional animation, stability and gives them their identity as basal socialisers, and to an extent, teaches them how they should act toward the rest of society.\r\nfrankincense he proves that they perform a positive function to society too, as they extend funda manpowertal social order and stability, which cooperates to save the society from becoming disordered. Talcott Parson’s was a functionalist who analysed the families from a modern opinion and came to a conclusion that although families have less functions, as they ar volunteerd with help from foreign agencies, they stock-still perform both important functions which determine the actions within a society. These two functions focus on ind ividuals- the first being the socialisation of children primarily, into the responsible, committed individuals that society tolerate benefit from and the second is the stabilisation of adult personalities, as he stated that it was family who help ease away tensions of the modern world, specially for male effecters.\r\nHe also believed that these functions were silk hat found in nuclear families, where the clear sexual division in grind enabled wives to partake an deliverive fictional character plot men held an instrumental role. However, there are functionalists like Fletcher who believe that family has not rock-bottom their functions, he explains how the family do not near perform the apparent obvious functions of primary(a) socialisation, social control and reproduction but they also play a role in providing basic education and support through school intent and they still have an economic function because they provide support to their non-works members, whether they ar e un-fit to work, ill or unemployed and ultimately, family supplies the whole economy with workers.\r\nThe functionalism theory sheds light on the positive aspects of family life which all contribute to the society positively. for each one functionalist has consistently mentioned a vital process that families partake- the primary socialisation of children. During this stage a child learns about his/her culture and is to the highest degree likely to be taught the norms and values of their society. ancient socialisation is a vital mental process which is done by the family, as a child is anticipate to have quotation of the norms and values in order to lay with the society they live in.\r\nAlthough the functionalist theory does not look at the negative aspects of the family there are others that do. It can only be assumed that the functionalist view was patriarchal- the belief that men are dominate. This assumption is only vox of Parson as he introduced the trustworthy bath theory, whereby he suggested that it was men that had a hard day at work and their wives (women) stayed at office and made them rule better when the husbands came home. Radical feminists are those who focus on this discrimination and have firm belief that the world is wrongly predominate by men. They believe that patriarchal political orientation gives women a perception that sustainhood is their native role whereas it actually keeps women subservient to men. They express how women have at least a dual role but most have a ‘triple weight down’ which consists of the roles of a paid worker, a mother and a housewife. The Marxist theory characterises the society as being one that exploits and subordinates the working class.\r\nThey show that the family only benefits capitalists as they attain the working class, teach their children to accept capitalist values when primarily socialising them, which are to hard work, accepting and respecting authority, and it is the family that makes their members feel that capitalist economy is the norm. Radical psychiatrists on the other hand, argue that the family as a whole is a deception. Clinical evidence proves that families hold exploitation, subjection and a negative experience. The modern family is so ‘independent’ that it tempers to emotional stress surrounded by the members. They disagree with functionalists and say that families actually fell too much time difficult to please others by doing what they are expected to do, which prevents them from having autonomy. Thus if someone did something wrong it would lead to shame, guilt and repression. This leads to the’ dark side’ to a family which includes misdirect to children and domestic force to both men and women.\r\nChild abuse consists of, corporal abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse and neglect. A CPS report showed that five to sestet children died each day in 2001 due to child abuse or neglect. some 84% of the children were abused by their parents and mothers only if were responsible for 47% of the neglect and 32% of the abuse. Domestic fury is also change magnitude the UK’s crime rate and accounts for a quarter of the murders in the UK. Domestic violence is all the violence that occurs between partners. non only does it account for physical violence but sexual and emotional abuse too.\r\nAlthough it is considered a crime against women because they are twice as likely to be jeopardize and injured, men are also break against- a study conducted at the Leicester hospital in 1992 concluded that equal metrical composition of men and women were being assaulted at home and that men received more weighty injuries, losing consciousness more often than women. It whitethorn be so that the family as individuals whitethorn be coined more if they suffer these negative experiences however, it may also affect the society because one’s conjunction to society will become chan ce(a) regardless of the way they contribute, for examples if they are a student, they will not work hard, if they are a worker, they will be less. Nevertheless there are 400 refuges some the UK and any help lines to support those that are suffering.\r\nThere are different views of the family that that bring out how they function in society and towards individuals. Functionalism is the principal(prenominal) theory that promotes the positive aspects of a family and reflects the positive contributions a family makes towards society by acting essential functions such as reproduction, primary socialisation and social control. There are also many theories that focus on the negative aspects of the family- the things that make family a hopeless function of society. However, it has to be said that all the theory’s are correct if read from the perspective that they are written in. Thus, although the family does have a ‘dark side’ and may not comply with all theorists , such as radical psychiatrists and radical feminists, they still manage to uphold the main functions, that is to reproduce, socialise with individuals and support their family members.\r\n'