The Leader-Follower Relationship :: leadership, motivation theories

lead is studied and analysed so that the effective practices can be taught and applied in todays schemes. The concept of leadership has been grow to discuss the abetter _or_ abettors role in the leader- participator relationship. While preeminent is often considered an active role, following can have a disallow connotation, especially when seen as a passive, subordinate position. However, following can be a choice, and the difference between the leader and follower is the activities, rather than abilities (Wren, p.201). An organization possesses effective pursuit is just as important for success as having effective leaders. Hersey and Blanchard describe this relationship as dynamic and use Situational leading (R) as a model for the leaders to improve the execution of instrument of their followers. Manz and Sims describe a historical view of leader types which has evolved to view the superleader as the most effective type for our current culture. The role of the superleader is to empower followers to become self-leaders themselves. The Situational Leadership model may contain the word Leadership, but it is mostly about effective management practices and does not extend developing the role of the follower. at that place is a difference between managing and leading. In Managerial Roles, H. Mintzberg describes 10 roles, grouped under the categories of interpersonal, informational and decision roles, that a director should posses. An effective leader should have those skills as well, in addition to having an boilers suit vision, clearly communicating those goals and motivating their followers to work towards it (Wren, p.378). Leadership is besides about directing change. Without change, leadership is only management of the status quo (MacNeil, Cavanagh, Silcox, p.6). There is nothing wrong with begin a successful manager, just as there is much value to be an effective follower.The role of the follower and subordinate is very dif ferent in terms of ability and choice. Subordinates ar considered passive, lacking in initiative and responsibility. The image of sheep comes to mind, where as followers argon more active, and engage in more critical thinking (Wren, p.195). Robert Kelley notwithstanding describes the effective followers have good self-management skills, abilities and motivation, which are exactly the analogous qualities apparent in effective leaders. That relationship between leader and follower is defined by the role they play, since an effective follower has the skills to switch positions with the leader.