Canterbury Tales :: essays research papers

In the poem, The Canterbury Tales, in that respect were two characters that were completely from each(prenominal) other. The two characters were two parts of a whole which is a dichotomy, for employment there were a ying and a yang. The subgenus Pastor was the light side, which is the ying and the friar represents the yang. The parson is a good domain who is poor, but he is rich in holy thoughts and works. He was satisfied with himself for knowing he had very little, and he was also very benign, and was also ready to give his poor parishioners anything that he could get. Chaucer does this to show the good side of The Church, and Chaucer does not do that real practically in his tales.The friar is the exact opposite. He was the vanquish friar somewhat because no one knew as much dalliance and sweet gabble as he did. He knew all the taverns, innkeepers and barmaids more than the lepers and beggars. He believed that be seen with paupers was not good for a man in his position an d there was no profit to be made with them, unlike with the rich and the sellers of food for thought which is profitable. He was also the best beggar in the area and no one else moved into his turf. In his tale he was a man that said he would pretend that he was holy. He also gives the best pardons to the people that give him the maximum amount of money. In the poem, Chaucer makes a tilt that says he is the only person that practices his profession accurately.During the Middle Ages friars were supposed to aggress sinners and evil away from the people, but they soon figured out that this was a profitable business. The most ironic thing about the friars was that they were supposed to ram evil away from people, but they committed evil deeds themselves.